On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Peter Budny <[email protected]> wrote:
> Toby Murray <[email protected]> writes: > > > For example, Kansas highway 18: > > type = route > > route = road > > network = US:KS > > ref = 18 > > (optional?) symbol=* tag > > Also an optional wikipedia link. > > > There does seem to be some debate about county roads. I would probably > > throw my vote in with something like "network=US:KS:Riley" > > +1 > As I've mentioned further up this thread we need a way to specify what sort of route it is. There's no easy way to determine if it's a US/State/County route from the proposed set of tags. > [...snip...] > So, there seems to be utility for both. The question is, what happens > when both a way and a relation have name= set, and they don't match? For the most part, I doubt route relations will be used for rendering names (only shields), so I don't know that we should worry about the name too much.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
