+1
On Oct 19, 2010, at 8:03 PM, "Mike N." <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That's not what I'm trying to do, because I don't see the point in >> trying to do that. There are much better places for me to get maps in >> the present. OSM, to me at least, is about the data, and how it can >> be used in the future. Especially in the United States. > > Keep in mind that there are already people using US OSM data in real > applications. By all means, let's move forward, but not burn consumers by > removing ref* or name* tags to force them to change. Otherwise we will just > be laboring like monks to produce a mountain of pure XML that no one cares > about because it's to difficult to catch a moving specification that has no > concern for compatibility. > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
