On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Ian Dees <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't know what to call it, but values would be interstate, us_route, > state_route, county_route, etc. The specific information about what > county/state it's in, the human readable name, the prefix, etc. should all > be stored in different tags (and not stuffed into one long network=* tag). > This sounds like a great use for the network tag to me. There are basically 4 highway networks in this country: Interstate, US, State, and County. I know that technically each state and county has it's own separate network, but most renderers are just going to display generic shields for state & county. For those who do want to render different shields for each state and/or county routes why not use sub tags as we commonly do for many other osm features: For Michigan route 12: ref=12 network=state state=michigan For Bennington County route 16 in Vermont: ref=16 network=county state=vermont county=bennington Zeke
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
