* Zeke Farwell <[email protected]> [2010-10-25 09:43 -0400]: > For those who do want to render different shields for each state and/or > county routes why not use sub tags as we commonly do for many other > osm features
Ian has suggested the established is_in= tag for this purpose, and Alex Mauer has suggested a relation that contains all the routes for a (state or lower) network. Personally, of those two, I think I prefer is_in=. > For Michigan route 12: > ref=12 > network=state > state=michigan Keep in mind that any tagging we do needs to be compatible with global usage, and network= is already in use. I'd suggest something along the lines of "US:State" and "US:County" to fit in with "US:I" and "US:US". (And also to continue keeping our own namespace for values.) -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- "Quick, you must come with me," she said. You're in great danger!" "Why?" "Because I will kill you if you don't." -- _Sourcery_, Terry Pratchett ---- --- -- _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
