On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Craig Hinners <cr...@hinnerspace.com> wrote: > Of course, it would be desirable to have consensus on the syntax of the > conceptual-level tag, be it "highway:network:us:fl=123", or > "highway:network=us:fl:123", or "highway=fl:123", but that's a > diversion from the crux of the issue, which is the overloaded use of > the "ref" tag.
This explicitly split out network information should be present in route relations. The ref=* tag on ways right now is mostly "tagging for the renderer" because current renderers don't use route relations. Richard Weait has done some work on this: http://weait.com/content/badges-badges and http://weait.com:8080/map/shield.html?lat=40.36679&lon=-89.10653&zoom=16&layers=BTF Toby _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us