On 5/1/2011 12:14 AM, Charlotte Wolter wrote:
Yes, that was my question originally. I am wondering why I saw two ways
when, from your point of view, there was one. And, they definitely were
there. As I zoomed in they diverged more and more. Hmm, anyone?
Yes, that was the extra node 83731621 at the end of way 45508495:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8017354
A bug in Potlatch's undeletion most likely caused this, so it's probably
unrelated to the earlier duplication.
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
