On 9/11/2011 7:53 AM, Anthony wrote:
The "no thru traffic" sign is nonstandard and very jurisdiction specific. In general there is no "letter of the law", as the law generally does not mention such signs.
You seem to be right (at least in Florida): http://myfloridalegal.com/ago.nsf/Opinions/B762787E37D4A3CD85256E620055999C
So the question is whether access=destination should be used where the sign exists but has no legal meaning. (As opposed to http://maps.google.com/maps?q=orlando&hl=en&ll=28.394553,-81.549518&spn=0.0168,0.041199&t=m&z=16&vpsrc=6&layer=c&cbll=28.394524,-81.549396&panoid=f638RcwkM8_a-3tntIJmRg&cbp=12,335.79,,1,3.19 which is on private property and hence presumably enforceable.)
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
