On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Metcalf, Calvin (DOT) <[email protected]> wrote: > The nice thing about ruby is that it's pretty easy to read with out actually > knowing much about ruby and the script that was linked to (attached) seems to > be what's on that page meaning it looks to be just poorly phrased
Thanks. There's several versions of the script in the directory, just assuming the latest version was used does not seem to be a safe assumption. I'm looking at the tiger:source tags in a random area in Utah which points to version 0.6 being used to import there. The mapping files are the same in 0.6 and 0.7 script versions, but did change from 0.1 to 0.2. The wiki seems to describe the 0.1 mapping in which separated: instead of tiger:separated was used. I'm analysing the tiger:source tags nationwide now, but it does not seem that the 0.1 script (and thus that version of the mapping file) were actually used in the final import. I'm hoping Dave can shed some light on this so we can finally have that page reflect what was actually done. -- martijn van exel geospatial omnivore 1109 1st ave #2 salt lake city, ut 84103 801-550-5815 http://oegeo.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
