On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Martijn van Exel <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Ian Dees <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > If parcel data is important to disaster response, I would expect the > >> > responder to go get the most up to date data from the source, not use > >> > stale > >> > data that was imported into OSM (potentially) some years ago > >> > >> Doesn't Haiti and Fukushima render this argument irrelevant? > > > > > > There's two separate issues here. What Frederik and others point out is > that > > most administrative boundary data has no place in OSM, for the (valid) > > reasons given. > > So why even bother having a landuse=* tag? I'm pretty sure it's because we want to make the osm.org mapnik layer different colors... Seriously though I think there is a case for separating between what looks like commercial, industrial, and residential areas.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
