On 5 June 2012 20:56, stevea <[email protected]> wrote: > But "socially," or more properly stated, in the context of "reaching OSM > consensus," what does our community think of (rather wholesale) reverts of a > contributor who has not agreed to the CT? Are we OK with that? Apologies > if this is already clearly stated somewhere. But if so, I haven't seen it > and it is high time we freshen up how/where we are about this.
Is it a pressing issue though? Mike N already said this, but the license redaction algorithm is being designed to do no more damage than a revert of the tainted edits, with the exception of undeletions mentioned by NE2. So, by my understanding, the best you can get by reverting edits is a state similar to that which you'll obtain by doing nothing and moving on to actual useful mapping. Cheers _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
