Well, looking at the way names, I see that a good number are missing directional prefixes. That's unfortunate...
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 5:45 PM, the Old Topo Depot <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Maybe, though I'm not sure the result is better. To me, it has more to do >> with whether the area has any other user edits (other than blars). >> Glendale, in particular, may be a decent candidate for a re-import, if I >> (or someone else) can ever get around to it. I've done a little bit of >> mapping around it, but those are easy to find and merge, and a couple of >> hours to process an import sure seems better than the time it will take to >> manually go street-by-street, particularly if it is well-aligned, as it has >> been in other LA areas. >> > > Are you speaking of the entirety of Glendale, or specific areas ? > > The downtown looks pretty good in terms of alignment and license. A lot > of the ways could be combined to reduce the over-labeling, and some could > be straightened a bit. > > Certainly the ways in (what I presume) are the hills to the east-ish are > under-noded and the TIGER 2011 geometry is superior. > > > John Novak > 585-OLD-TOPOS (585-653-8676)
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
