Dale Puch wrote: > Only thing better would be a data layer that new stuff could be copied > from instead of the image layer to trace.
Potlatch 2 can do that by loading shapefiles. The only issue is that I suspect the TIGER shapefiles might be so big that they boggle Potlatch/Flash Player/your browser. If anyone were to feel like splitting them into more manageable chunks... cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/TIGER-2011-Data-tp5714968p5715018.html Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
