> We need to stop talking in nebulous terms. "the complaints here" are > apparently unknown to everyone. If it's not appropriate to describe the > specific issues, then perhaps we shouldn't be having this conversation on the > mailing list.
Heh, one has to be quite new to talk-us to not know the likely suspect(s). Oops, I think my bias is showing. That notwithstanding, I think it is quite reasonable to discuss the DWG boundaries and guidelines without details of a specific conflict. It makes sense to discuss and decide what the purview *should* be, before you can decide if a given conflict falls within those boundaries. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
