On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote:
> On Monday, January 7, 2013, Ian Dees wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Nathan Mixter <nmix...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> It would be awesome to include the land ownership data from BLM >>> especially if we could do it for the whole US. Unfortunately that is >>> probably not something that people would want to add because of the >>> conflicts with other data. I wonder if we could include it on a limited >>> basis or only include certain features. >> >> >> We just had this conversation a couple threads ago. This sort of land >> ownership border doesn't really belong in OSM because we can't improve it. >> It's already in OSM because some people imported the BLM data so they could >> see national park boundaries. >> > > Just because we can't improve it doesn't mean it can't improve the map. > I disagree. If we can't improve it then the only thing it can do is sit in the database and become wrong.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
