On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Clay Smalley <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think it makes perfect sense to separate it into name=* and > bridge:name=* tags. The bridge:name=* currently isn't rendered, but > theoretically, it could be rendered differently and in a more > appropriate/eye-catching way than name=*. This leaves the case though, what > if a bridge doesn't carry a street name but only a bridge name (such as the > aforementioned Golden Gate Bridge and Brooklyn Bridge)? > +1 -- Clifford OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
