Hi Serge, - If there are two tags for the feature id, we should pick one and change the other one. - I don't think the ele tag should be renamed just because it is only accurate to 60m. Everything in the database is an estimate. - I would be ok with removing all of the gnis:* tags except the feature id. There is no reason for us to maintain the other data. - You might want to keep the ele tags.
Thanks Jason On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Kevin Kenny <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/20/2013 04:54 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote: >> >> In addition, I suggest that we remove two other tags conditionally. >> >> I suggest we remove the "ele" tag unless the tag natural=peak is >> present and that we remove "source" if the value for that tag is "USGS >> Geonames" (which is just GNIS).penny stove > > > ele= is certainly meaningful for aeroways. And I suspect that the > UUID will be meaningful when trying to cross-reference back to the > original data. > > > On 08/20/2013 06:04 PM, Apollinaris Schoell wrote: >> >> go for it. >> actually the ele tag is quite wrong on peaks and should be removed too or >> renamed to something like estimated ele > > > Please don't. If you want to add a tag like ele:status=estimated, that would > be a better solution. There's always imprecision in elevations; even GPS > usually has considerable vertical dilution of position. An elevation derived > from photogrammetric contour lines is better than no elevation at all. > > -- > 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
