Yes, that is correct Martijn. Would allow us to make sure relations are intact inside of JOSM if the cardinal directions segments got the same split graphic that forward/backward does in the relation editor. :) I think that was one of the major reasons most of the relations in the USA got the "forward/backward" roles in the first place since the north/south & east/west roles didn't.
Also, here again is the link to the ticket on JOSM that added those graphics for the forward/backward roles if it will help you to see how feasible cardinal direction graphics would be. https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/5109 - James > From: [email protected] > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:26:27 -0700 > Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US & State > highways. > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > > You mean that in the relation editor, you would be able to see the > same split between north / south and east / west that you currently > see for forward/backward? (like here > https://www.dropbox.com/s/dwi2gx8tixsuva2/Screen%20Shot%202013-11-26%20at%209.25.08%20AM.jpg > ) > > Yes, that makes sense to me. I can look into how much work that would be. > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:14 AM, James Mast <[email protected]> wrote: > > So, nobody has a comment on my idea (from the 22nd) of getting JOSM to show > > north/south or east/west splits in the relation editor to be displayed the > > same way as the forward/backward gets shown already? I would try to do some > > coding to allow that to happen in JOSM, but I don't know how to code in > > Java. > > > > -James > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-us mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > > > > > > -- > Martijn van Exel > http://oegeo.wordpress.com/ > http://openstreetmap.us/
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
