I’ve always thought the “signage” thing was a little absurd anyway — as if the signs are somehow the official documentation and not a reflection of the official documentation. Yet somehow, using the official documentation becomes an import. That makes no sense to me.
Darrell > Steve wasn't talking about proposed routes at all: USBRs 1, 10, 36, 37, and > 50 are officially approved routes. There's nothing to "open", though the > signage situation varies from state to state. AASHTO designation doesn't come > with a deadline for signage, but the state DOTs didn't go through the trouble > of getting local and national approval just to sit on these designations. And > when the signs do go up, we can be assured that they'll go up along the > officially approved routes. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
