2014-11-26 18:30 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wiseman <awise...@gmail.com>: > That was me -- but I would argue it's an unusual way to tag it -- it's not > the individual letters that are important, it's the whole piece.
yes, that is clear, and the data in OSM also reflected this by having a site relation to group all the letters into the actual monument. That relation is the object to put the name, wikipedia link, tourism=attraction tag etc. (and they are all there). > You wouldn't tag each president in Mount Rushmore and leave it at that, > right? I wouldn't leave it as that, but I also wouldn't tag them singularly and then add another node for the whole, I'd rather try to combine the "individual presidents" into a whole piece of artwork by using a relation. cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
