Could you include the new node in the relation as role=label? That's at least somewhat documented...
On Thursday, November 27, 2014, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2014-11-26 18:30 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wiseman <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>: > >> That was me -- but I would argue it's an unusual way to tag it -- it's >> not the individual letters that are important, it's the whole piece. > > > > yes, that is clear, and the data in OSM also reflected this by having a > site relation to group all the letters into the actual monument. That > relation is the object to put the name, wikipedia link, tourism=attraction > tag etc. (and they are all there). > > > >> You wouldn't tag each president in Mount Rushmore and leave it at that, >> right? > > > > I wouldn't leave it as that, but I also wouldn't tag them singularly and > then add another node for the whole, I'd rather try to combine the > "individual presidents" into a whole piece of artwork by using a relation. > > > cheers, > Martin > > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
