Access tags seem inappropriate to me in this case. I would only tag the last node as noexit=yes (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noexit) as a way of making clear that the trail does indeed end and hasn't just not been mapped. Leave the rest to the users of the map -- maybe there is actually a great spot for hunting/geocaching/sunbathing/beaver watching/ mushroom foraging at the end of the trail that you just don't know about.
Harald. On Mon Dec 22 2014 at 11:54:58 AM Jack Burke <[email protected]> wrote: > access=use_at_your_own_risk > > access=two_paths_diverged_in_a_yellow_wood > > access=choose_wisely > > access=plugh > > access=xyzzy > > ? > > -jack > > > On December 22, 2014 10:06:15 AM EST, Richard Welty < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 12/22/14 3:27 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: >> >> I've frequently wanted to map "the trails that peter out" for exactly >> the reason you state. >> >> The choices as a mapper seem wrong: >> 1) Map the trail : thus encouraging use of a flawed route. >> 2) Don't map the trail. The casual map reader thinks OSM is missing >> something. >> >> >> Possible solutions include a node type of "becomes indistinct", or >> "dead end". >> How to mark the way is trickier. >> >> perhaps a new access tag.. >> >> access=deprecated >> access=not_recommended >> >> something else? >> >> richard >> >> -- [email protected] >> Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting >> OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux >> Java - Web Applications - Search >> >> Talk-us mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >> >> > -- > Typos courtesy of fancy auto-spell technology. > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
