On 6/29/15 4:58 PM, Brad Neuhauser wrote: > I think there's also this? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303225395 > ah, missed that.
depends on whether the requirements of http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Darchaeological_site are met; if they are, then OSM is correct. otherwise i don't think we've discussed this in OHM in a lot of detail. we would see it as a place name that is "real" for some period of time, so i don't think we'd just copy the osm style tagging for this. richard -- [email protected] Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
