Sorry for the late response, great idea Clifford. I will contact the editor first. But my opinion is it does not meet the requirements and therefor should be removed from osm. If it should be moved to OHM is another discussion.
*Regards,* *Hans* *http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13 <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13>* *Sorry for any misspellings* On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Hans De Kryger <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry about that, should of been more specific. I meant the archeological > site. > On Jun 29, 2015 2:24 PM, "Clifford Snow" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Richard Welty <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Darchaeological_site >>> >> >> Thanks for pointing out the wiki page on archaeological sites. I wasn't >> aware it was documented. >> >> >> -- >> @osm_seattle >> osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us >> OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-us mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >> >>
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
