On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Ray Kiddy <[email protected]> wrote:
> Together they seem to delineate the city of Chino Hills, CA, which is a > small city and not the same as Chino, CA. And I am seeing no relation > for Chino Hills. > > Am I right in thinking that it would be correct to create a relation to > contain these two ways to define the city boundaries? > looks like the relation was broken/removed. Seems like the right thing is to do like you suggest. Check the boundaries - Looks like Chino Hills has a sliver of its boundary inside another county. That doesn't means its wrong, just worth checking out. Those other cities w/o relations - I don't believe they are needed if they don't share borders with others. Clifford -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
