On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Harald Kliems <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would map greenways/bike boulevards as lcn=yes or, if they have a name, > maybe as a lcn route relation. Other than that, I think it's more important > to map physical characteristics such as stop signs, bike-specific > infrastructure, diverters, and speed limits on those routes. > Even if it's not named, the fact that it may be named or numbered in the future and generally traverses multiple ways (or a way that may be split with the addition of more detail later), I tend to go with relations for routes rather than go with lcn/rcn/ncn=yes. The tags on the way should describe the way, not the route; the route relation is there for the route. (Have I mentioned it's time to kill ref=* on ways as describing the overlying route yet, like Linus killed ext1 after ext3 became a thing?)
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
