On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 22:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Minh Nguyen <m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us> wrote:
> Jack Burke <burkejf3@...> writes: > > > > > You're not crazy. Just using the regular OSM website interface, I > > can find > the city node, and the county boundary, but not a city boundary. > AFAICT, it isn't a consolidated city-County, so it should exist. > > Looks like the original TIGER boundary way got deleted back in 2010, > and I can't find any traces of ways that superseded it: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/4084221 > > As a first step, I undeleted that way using Potlatch 1: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33135846 > > Now it needs to be turned into a relation and integrated with the > adjacent boundary ways. > Wow. I have not gotten to the point, in my mapping adventures, where I have had to look at changesets like this. A new thing to learn. Thanks for the reverts. I will get to fixing the rest of that soon. thanx - ray _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
