Richard Welty wrote: > the key thing, i think, is that mappers have little motivation to > work on route relations if they don't actually get used by > anything.
Don't forget that the issue is not an endemic issue with route relations, it's just an osm2pgsql issue. osm2pgsql is the most popular tool for loading data into a database for raster rendering. But it's not the only one; that's not the only use case for OSM data; and who knows whether osm2pgsql will remain pivotal as vector rendering supersedes raster rendering. I use Interstate route relations as a small part of cycle.travel's routing algorithm, for example. "Anything" is a big word! Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Re-Proposal-Sunset-ref-on-ways-in-favor-of-relations-tp5859312p5859503.html Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
