On 11/11/15 8:49 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > County and city routes might be a tough nut to crack. The two Tulsa > City Expressways use fairly generic (and in the old pre-carto > rendering, coincidentally approximated) official signage. > so produce a generic looking svg file for the particular shield. > Gilcrease Expressway (G): > http://s167.photobucket.com/user/bugo348/media/gilcreaseexpy.jpg.html > Tisdale Parkway (LL): > http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2682/4185244881_b1236112b2.jpg > > None of the county routes in Tulsa County are signed, though they are > painted on the pavement itself in Nowata County, and posted on the > same style sign as street names in Osage and Washington Counties, and > there's yet more that use standard MUTCD-style county shields, and at > least one that simply uses blue painted metal sheets with the numbers > spraypaint-stenciled on. Probably suggest using the generic MUTCD > shield when the exact shield is unknown, and approximate it when it is > known. But let's cross that bridge once the ball is rolling and the > state level systems and higher are rendering from relations... > and for unsigned routes, either don't create the relation, or create a relation and use unsigned_ref instead of ref
county routes in Westchester County NY are unsigned for example; we should not be generating shields in the rendering since they cannot be observed on the ground. richard -- rwe...@averillpark.net Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
