On 11/19/15 9:33 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Paul Fox <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > thanks. i wasn't sure if "discussion" was the same as > "announcement", but > i guess it is in this case. i also didn't realize the relation > work was > so complete -- i was under the impression this was still > preliminary, but > i suppose i misread that. > > > The relation work was starting to come on line a while a go, but so > far there's been no big push to get anyone to consume it, even though > it does make dealing with routes much more tidy. Hence why I proposed > we start pushing relations for route by default. > Paul Norman differs on the completeness of the relation work. i would be interested in hearing his list of the issues he thinks needs to be addressed.
richard -- [email protected] Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
