Kevin Kenny wrote: > In fact, I think the best approach might be to confine the > initial import to the open water features (appropriately > conflated with what is already in OSM), with the other > wetland features being added later. Doing the open water > in small sections and conflating as we go would give us > confidence in the alignment.
That sounds great. I'm far from the biggest fan of imports, but good-quality data for unnavigable waters in comparatively remote regions is pretty much the poster child for "ain't going to be surveyed", so I'd say go for it. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Second-attempt-Potential-data-source-Adirondack-Park-Freshwater-Wetlands-tp5868622p5870093.html Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
