there is also https://opentopomap.org, is this similar to what you need ?

regards

m

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Lars Ahlzen <l...@ahlzen.com> wrote:
> On 05/20/2016 10:58 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
>>
>> On 5/20/16 9:24 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
>>>
>>> I was just on TopOSM [1] which appears to be very outdated. Does
>>> anyone know who maintains this site?
>>>
>>> [1] http://toposm.ahlzen.com/
>>
>> lars ahlzen maintains it. not sure if he's still monitoring this list
>> closely or not.
>
>
> I do. It's pretty out of date indeed.
>
> TopOSM was never rendered on-the-fly. It's just a (very large) set of static
> tiles (currently hosted by Stamen). To update it I'd have to either
> re-render and upload the entire set, or improve it until it can be rendered
> in real time. I was working on the latter [1] but never quite finished it.
>
> There's already the OSM cycle map which has a lot of the same features,
> though with a slightly different focus. I guess one advantage of something
> like toposm is that it can use higher-resolution data from sources like
> USGS, and uses US conventions for things like units, symbols and other
> cartographic details.
>
> Would it be would be worth picking it up again?
>
> - Lars
>
> [1] https://github.com/Ahlzen/TopOSM2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to