>are there matching street signs ? I'm not sure. But if we know a street has legally-restricted access, I think our tagging should match that access regardless of whether there's a sign or not.
Example: Service roads inside an apartment complex (usually tagged "access=private") are an example of tagging access without a sign. If anything, I'm betting they'll have signs posted on the unaffected major streets at city limits, which is where you'll often see signs about cell phone usage while driving or red light cameras. >of course, a better approach would be adding traffic calming features or making roads one-way so that cut-through would not be beneficial much. Respectfully, I don't think mapping features that don't actually exist is a good practice in the long-run. I think a conditional access tag is the best way to go here, since it's the only one that will restrict access according to the city's ordinance. Thanks, Andrew On Jan 8, 2018 1:28 PM, "Rihards" <[email protected]> wrote: On 2018.01.08. 21:07, Andrew Matheny wrote: > I believe the affected streets would just need a conditional access tag, no? > > Something like: > > access:conditional=destination @ (06:00-10:00; 16:00-21:00) are there matching street signs ? of course, a better approach would be adding traffic calming features or making roads one-way so that cut-through would not be beneficial much. the reporting segment did not portray the local govt as being very competent. > Thanks, > > Andrew > > On Jan 8, 2018 12:55 PM, "Jack Burke" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I'll leave it to others to decide what, if anything, we should do > about this. > > http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2018/01/05/leonia-streets-off- navigational-apps/ > <http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2018/01/05/leonia-streets-off- navigational-apps/> > > --jack > > -- > Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology ... -- Rihards
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
