But they *are* lanes. They just aren't striped. -jack -- Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology
On May 8, 2018 3:24:08 PM EDT, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: >The tag you're looking for is width, not lanes. > >On Tue, May 8, 2018, 13:29 Tod Fitch <t...@fitchdesign.com> wrote: > >> Most residential roads in my area are unstriped but are definitely >built >> for two lanes of traffic (one in each direction). It seems perfectly >> reasonable to me to tag them with lanes=2 as they are designed to >take two >> lanes of traffic. >> >> In fact, as part of some traffic calming measures a number of >residential >> roads are having the lane striping removed. They claim that people >tend to >> drive slower if there is no marking showing the boundary for oncoming >> traffic. I certainly will not be removing lanes=2 from those roads. >> >> >> > On May 8, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Mike N <nice...@att.net> wrote: >> > >> > On 5/8/2018 11:55 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: >> >> Then with residential streets where there are no lanes, often >lanes=2 >> would get tagged anyway despite nothing on the ground suggesting that >was >> actually the case. >> > >> > I hadn't considered that unstriped roads shouldn't have lane >tagging, >> but at least this doesn't cause bad effects for map data users. >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Talk-us mailing list >> > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org >> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-us mailing list >> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >>
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
