Right, we're only counting striped lanes. On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Jack Burke <[email protected]> wrote:
> But they *are* lanes. They just aren't striped. > > -jack > -- > Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology > > > On May 8, 2018 3:24:08 PM EDT, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The tag you're looking for is width, not lanes. >> >> On Tue, May 8, 2018, 13:29 Tod Fitch <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Most residential roads in my area are unstriped but are definitely built >>> for two lanes of traffic (one in each direction). It seems perfectly >>> reasonable to me to tag them with lanes=2 as they are designed to take two >>> lanes of traffic. >>> >>> In fact, as part of some traffic calming measures a number of >>> residential roads are having the lane striping removed. They claim that >>> people tend to drive slower if there is no marking showing the boundary for >>> oncoming traffic. I certainly will not be removing lanes=2 from those roads. >>> >>> >>> > On May 8, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Mike N <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > On 5/8/2018 11:55 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: >>> >> Then with residential streets where there are no lanes, often lanes=2 >>> would get tagged anyway despite nothing on the ground suggesting that was >>> actually the case. >>> > >>> > I hadn't considered that unstriped roads shouldn't have lane tagging, >>> but at least this doesn't cause bad effects for map data users. >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Talk-us mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-us mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >>> >>
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
