I believe folks still use it in places to indicate that no-one has reviewed it on the ground, but I cannot find the thread(s) where that was brought up. I think a mechanical removal may be a bit overzealous, even though I personally wouldn't shed a tear. As long as there is at least one tag left that would indicate TIGER as the original source, so we can continue to detect 'unmodified TIGER' roads.-- Martijn van Exel [email protected]
On Fri, May 11, 2018, at 10:25, Clifford Snow wrote: > The tag, tiger:reviewed that is left over from the 2006/7 import of > TIGER roads has lost any meaning. For example, look at 196th Avenue > Southwest [1] in Thurston County WA. It's on version 6 yet still has > tiger:reviewed=no. Note I picked this street at random from a overpass > query [2]. I see this tag all the time. It's time to get rid of it. > Not through a mechanical edit, but by editors making changes to roads.> > I'm proposing to open a ticket for JOSM to add this tag to the list of > discarded tags. I'd like to hear if there are any objects or think > this is a good idea.> > I did learn from Toby Murray this morning that you can add > tiger:reviewed to the list of discarded tags in JOSM by going to preferences- > >Advanced Preferences and adding tiger:reviewed to tags.discardable. > Then just reload JOSM for the changed to be active.> > [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173554611 > [2] http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/yJh > > Clifford > > -- > @osm_seattle > osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us > OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch > _________________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
