Just to clarify, I'm not proposing a mechanical edit. I don't think it's appropriate.
>From reading the responses, most people would prefer to keep the tag tiger:reviewed. I respect it and will not ask for a change in JOSM. Clifford On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Wolfgang Zenker <[email protected]> wrote: > * Richard Welty <[email protected]> [180511 20:16]: > > On 5/11/18 2:00 PM, Doug Hembry wrote: > >> So I cast a vote for keeping it. At least don't mechanically remove > them > >> all, everywhere. > > > i still use the reviewed tags for guidance as well, and would prefer > > that they > > stick around. i remove them when i've reviewed a road carefully (name, > > connectivity, location, classification, surface.) > > same for me; loosing this tag would make it much harder for me to > keep track of the roads I have already reviewed/fixed and which ones are > still to do. > > Wolfgang > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
