The ref=* tag on ways is already 100% redundant if the way is already a part of the appropriate route relations and should be phased out so ref can be used to actually describe the way's ref, where applicable.
Also, can we kill this dinosaur entirely already? Route relations have been a widely accepted thing for a decade now, if you're not using route relations for your primary source of route information (instead of expecting tags on some other non route object to tell you), then you're doing it wrong and you don't matter. On Fri, Aug 24, 2018, 07:38 Mihai Iepure <mihai.iep...@telenav.com> wrote: > Hey everyone! > > > > We’re looking for your opinion on the existence of ref tags on links – > should it be there? Is it redundant if the link is already in a route > relation that has the ref tag? > > > > We’ve created a Github ticket > <https://github.com/TelenavMapping/US_mapping_projects/issues/25> to let > us know what you think, so feel free to post your thoughts there. > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > Mihai Iepure > Map Analyst > > [image: Description: cid:image002.png@01CCCAE5.664FA940] > > www.telenav.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
