I notice the user SSR_317 has been adding the route numbers of unnamed roads to the name=* tag of roads around Indianapolis. For example, name=Interstate 465, name=US 31, name=State Route 37, etc. Isn't this practice frowned upon as being redundant and not reflecting the lack of a proper name to the road? This seems to be the case around the country. All route numbers were listed in alternate names of the roads in the original TIGER data, but the vast majority of these have been removed in favor of route relations and ref=* tags.
I removed these name tags from the affected roads, but the user has since re-added them. —Albert Pundt
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
