On 06.11.18 14:51, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > On 06.11.2018 11:53, Vivek Bansal wrote: >> 2. I would certainly love smaller more regularly updated extracts! I'm >> not sure how much my team would pay for it though. > > The downloads are free of charge. Maybe I should check with the > Interline folks, I don't want to step on their toes with anything. > >> 3. I think the most common analysis patterns rely on regions greater >> than each county, but smaller than just NorCal and SoCal. The 6 >> californias here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Californias >> is pretty close to what I would suggest (except i'd have the Bay Area 9 >> county region to be one group, perhaps the 7th California?). I don't >> know of any spatial files with this breakdown. > > Creating the split bounds is probably the least difficult part of the > puzzle. Reason I'm asking the locals is that I want to create a split > that is as useful as possible so thank you for the pointer - is the "six > Californias" idea well-known enough that someone in, say, Napa County > would immediately know to look for themselves in "North California" and > not in "Jefferson" or "Central California"?
It might be worth being careful with this - political boundaries are sensitive, think partitioning any country in historically sensitive or contested areas. If the split is a divisive topic (haha), perhaps its better to avoid it. > While I don't *like* overlapping areas, it would be *possible* to have > them if it matches what people expect to find. I could do > SoCal+NorCal+Bay Area, or the 6 Californias plus Bay Area, or whatever. > > Bye > Frederik -- Rihards _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us