On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 3:58 AM Minh Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2018-11-20 08:57, Martijn van Exel wrote: > > When I map these roads I include the FS number (just the number) as a > > ref, since that is how they are signposted in the field. > > I think the ref tag on the ways should have a prefix and not just > consist of a bare number. Otherwise, it's just as ambiguous for data > consumers as the (123) refs all over New Jersey, since the U.S. doesn't > have a highway tag that corresponds one-for-one with forest routes. > Agreed, I tend to follow the Forest Service's own convention of going with FS for 2 digit routes and NFD (National Forest Development) for 3 and 4 digit routes.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
