Mar 21, 2019, 3:29 PM by [email protected]:

> The benefit is that it gives mappers a reason to examine places - not just 
> the disappeared feature itself but also the area around it - that would 
> otherwise go unexamined. Since we have so much unexamined space in the U.S., 
> any opportunity to spark mappers’ curiosity about some of that space, is a 
> welcome trigger. 
>
> It may feel like a time sink for some, but my hope is that others will feel 
> it’s an interesting exercise to improve the map. 
>
I think that existing issues detected by say Osmose are more than enough to 
encourage fixing stuff.

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/ <http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/> 
has massive amount of things to fix, even in well 
mapped areas.

Willing mappers are bottleneck, so whenever rare of bot-fixable
problems happens I think that it is a good idea to use it and spend human 
mapping time
on something more useful.

And if there is any danger of any area in USA running out of Maproulette or 
Osmose tasks - 
let me know and I will create something.

Especially Wikipedia-related one, as side effect of my project of finding 
tourism attractions
based on OSM data I created validator detecting various issues with wikipedia 
and wikidata tasks,
if anyone is interested I may run it for some part of USA.

> Stepping back a bit, the urge to fix previous automated edits with new 
> automated fixes is understandable, but it may lead to a more casual approach 
> to imports and automated edits, because we basically say with each fix that 
> ill-informed automated map edits can always be fixed with more automated 
> edits later. We’ve already gone down that path in the U.S. quite far, so we 
> should proceed with extra care - unless we as a community decide that that is 
> the nature of OSM in this country. It isn’t to me.
>
I fully support proper discussion before doing automatic changes, especially on 
larger scale and
ones that will delete items making them harder to reverse.

And I would be really irritated if someone would use this automatic edit 
proposal to 
support "my edit requires no discussion, after all sooner or later someone will 
fix my mess".

_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to