Mar 21, 2019, 6:23 PM by [email protected]: > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 9:52 AM Mateusz Konieczny <> [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > >> Good idea, independent check would be welcomed! >> >> Something from Seattle region would be OK, right? >> >> If my googling went right the you are probably interested >> in data around >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Glassman/history#map=8/47.780/-122.388 >> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Glassman/history#map=8/47.780/-122.388> >> >> > > Seattle area is fine or Skagit County to the north. Seattle would give me > more nodes to review which is good. > I uploaded files and linked in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/remove_objects_that_are_not_existing_according_to_source_of_import_that_added_them#List_of_candidates For now just file with all nodes in .osm file (can be opened with JOSM). As it is limited to nodes it works fairly well and ca be browsed without performance issues. I uploaded also file with objects very far away from Seattle deleted but it turned out to produce larger file, probably JOSM recorded deletions. I can produce later something more user friendly if that would be useful and .osm files are too complicated - let me know if that would be useful!
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
