I agree that the current OpenStreetMap data is wrong. For example, I grew up in the Klamath National Forest, and that area should include the Marble Mountain wilderness, it’s shouldn’t be a hole in the National Forest.
-Joseph On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 10:40 AM Tod Fitch <t...@fitchfamily.org> wrote: > If I am looking at the map data correctly, it seem that at least some > designated wilderness areas are excluded from the forest that they are in. > For example the Chumash Wilderness [1] seems to have its border as an outer > on the Los Padres National Forest [2]. > > This does not seem correct to me. In this specific case the wilderness is > administered as part of the Mt. Pinos Ranger District of the Los Padres > National Forest. I believe the same situation exists with the San Mateo > Wilderness in the Cleveland National Forest. > > What is our tagging policy on this? Should the wilderness be shown as part > of the forest that contains it? (I realize there may be wilderness areas > that cover multiple forests but the usual case is that a wilderness area is > a subset of a forest both geographically and administratively. > > Comments? > > Thanks > Tod > > > [1] > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2779216#map=12/34.7913/-119.1759 > [2] > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2784140#map=11/34.7975/-119.2302 > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
