On 6/6/20 9:24 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 8:24 AM Mike Thompson <miketh...@gmail.com
<mailto:miketh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
ref:
The wiki states that these should be ref=FR + <what is on the
sign>. In practice:
* ref:usfs=FS + <what is on the sign>
* ref=FS + <what is on the sign>
Most of the changesets that added a "ref:usfs" tag include a very
helpful comment that this issue was discussed on the tagging list
at sometime in the past and that this was the consensus, e.g.
[2]. If this continues to be the consensus, can we change the wiki?
ref=FS <what's on the sign>
Ultimately consider adding a route relation with
network=US:NSFR:Forest Name:FH/FR as well so we can finally kill off
route tagging on things that are not routes. Not sure we really need
the FH/FR distinction, however, since within the same forest, they're
all the same network: The 2 digit routes are major, the 3 digits are
minor (like parking lots and campgrounds) and the 4 digits are usually
only usable by log trucks and 4x4s. Trails are another matter.
I prefer ref=FS xxx too. I think the tagging discussion that
suggested ref:usfs was using that for the route relation.
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
