On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 5:45 PM stevea <stevea...@softworkers.com> wrote: > > I think we need both as well. I've been doing this while watching the evolution of how we best do this as I participate in a "do our best, always better" efforts to accomplish this. Even now! > > The idea of the first kind is simply a relation with a focus on the / a polygon with the outer (-most) membership. The idea of the second kind is one of these plus a carefully crafted inner membership, often made up of a complex inholding distribution containing many sometimes complex themselves inner polygons. Thanks Steve for your insightful comments.
I was thinking just create separate polygons for inholdings, tagged with access=private and possibly ownership=private Mike
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
