On 6/20/20 6:19 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 5:45 PM stevea <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> I think we need both as well. I've been doing this while watching
the evolution of how we best do this as I participate in a "do our
best, always better" efforts to accomplish this. Even now!
>
> The idea of the first kind is simply a relation with a focus on the
/ a polygon with the outer (-most) membership. The idea of the second
kind is one of these plus a carefully crafted inner membership, often
made up of a complex inholding distribution containing many sometimes
complex themselves inner polygons.
Thanks Steve for your insightful comments.
I was thinking just create separate polygons for inholdings, tagged
with access=private and possibly ownership=private
Mike
I think its simpler and better to just create an inner boundary as was
done with the Coconino NF
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
