It's my fault for not zooming in more. I did not see it at all when I downloaded that area in JOSM. I sent a note to tyndale about that. I understand that there is a direction towards using boundary to replace state and county use of leisure=park. I have seen plenty of expections to those description, meaning state and county parks that are urban manicured parks. However, it is not an argument I'm going to pick. I would just like to be sure the parks don't disappear in the process, like this one.
What query feature did you use? Thank you, Doug Peterson Clifford Snow <[email protected]> wrote .. > I believe this is the park > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549549501#map=14/41.9987/-86.5489. > Looking at the history, I see when you created it. It was changed to > boundary=park by user tyndale on changeset > openstreetmap.org/changeset/86836794 > > I don't believe boundary=state_park is appropriate. User tyndale didn't > offer any insight on why the change in the changeset comment. You might ask > them. > > BTW - I found the park by using the query feature and looking at the > history. > > Best, > Clifford >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
