On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:56 AM Doug Peterson < [email protected]> wrote:
> It's my fault for not zooming in more. I did not see it at all when I > downloaded that area in JOSM. I sent a note to tyndale about that. I > understand that there is a direction towards using boundary to replace > state and county use of leisure=park. I have seen plenty of expections to > those description, meaning state and county parks that are urban manicured > parks. However, it is not an argument I'm going to pick. I would just like > to be sure the parks don't disappear in the process, like this one. > I've added a number of state parks in Washington State. I'd be asking why. boundary=state_park has little use and it is obvious that it doesn't render. Most of the discussion on state parks seems to be around tagging it as a nature reserve. After some quick research, it appears that our state only has two parks that a portion of the land is considered nature reserve. > > What query feature did you use? > I use the OSM Website query tool https://mycloud.snowandsnow.us/index.php/s/MeEjnCeidjB2QQr > > -- @osm_washington www.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
