There are many different OSM tagging "dialects" to describe the details of a foot-cycle-way crossing a road. I looked up the situation of the example on Mapillary. From that it looks as if the specific path is a combined foot cycle way (yellow diamond sign with a bicycle and a pedestrian side by side). That means the path could be tagged as highway=path bicycle=designated foot=desgnated segregated=no (plus surface, smoothness, width, lit etc) The part that crosses the road (between the kerbs) should additionally be tagged with path=crossing The crossing node between the foot-cycle-way and the road should be tagged as highway=crossing crossing=uncontrolled foot=yes bicycle=yes
The essential part is that the crossing node caries the information that is needed fr routing along the road for cars, and for bicycles and pedestrians along the foot cycle way. I noted that the highway=path carries the name and the the corresponding relation carries the same name. That seems redundant. Volker <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
