Do you have a more authoritative source for municipal boundaries than the US Census Bureau?
If you don't, it'll be hard for you to convince everyone here that the US Census data is wrong. On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 5:03 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us < talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > FYI; > > for all of you who are not in country and do not understand about usa > city bounders. > > https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/contact.html > > and did you read what the other guy said, this is the census data not true > map data. > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89598349. > > > Tuesday, August 18, 2020 10:52 AM -05:00 from James Umbanhowar < > jumba...@gmail.com>: > > What link are you using for this? I downloaded the places boundary > information from here: > https://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/geo/shapefiles/index.php > > As I said, I'm happy to change, but I can't change without actual > information. > > On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 18:43 +0300, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us wrote: > > i am looking at the TIRGER web, show’s the real map online and > > nothing you did matches. > > > > i live here and a block away from the edens spur just saying. > > > > > Tuesday, August 18, 2020 10:38 AM -05:00 from James Umbanhowar < > > > jumba...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > It would probably be best if these suggestions were added in the > > > changeset comments, as they don't need to be discussed on the > > > mailing > > > list. > > > > > > On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 11:36 -0400, James Umbanhowar wrote: > > > > I'm the person who made the changes and am happy to adjust the > > > map to > > > > better authoritative data or information. My motivation for this > > > was > > > > to fix a mangled boundary relation that didn't have consistent > > > outer > > > > and inner members. The changes came in two changesets, > > > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89220282 and > > > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89516909 > > > > > > > > The first changeset just made the relation consistent with outer > > > ways > > > > and inner ways. I preserved all the ways that were in the > > > relation > > > > that > > > > lead to the inconsistency and they are still in the database with > > > a > > > > note attached to them. The second came after a changeset comment > > > that > > > > noted that the fixed relation didn't match and earlier unbroken > > > > relation, in particular around the Edens Spur. I then changed the > > > > border in this area to match the 2019 Tiger data in that area > > > only. > > > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 02:37 +0300, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us > > > wrote: > > > > > Changeset #89220282 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Monday, August 17, 2020 6:34 PM -05:00 from Mike Thompson < > > > > > > miketh...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:24 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us < > > > > > > talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > > > > > > tiger is up to date on the web map using the current data i > > > > > > > just > > > > > > > think he picked the wrong year, > > > > > > > > > > > > That relation was first created in 2009. According to the > > > source > > > > > > tag, it used 2008 Tiger data, so the original mapper probably > > > > > > used > > > > > > the best available TIGER data at the time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > also all he got was a white line in his first try. > > > > > > > Way: 813726663 > > > > > > > > > > > > That way needs to be added to the relation, and the relation > > > must > > > > > > close. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
